Legal Opinion

United States v. Hearst

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 26, 1976No. Cr. 74-364-OJCPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO BAR DEFENDANT’S PROFFERED PSYCHIATRIC TESTIMONY AND MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT TESTIMONY

OLIVER J. CARTER, Chief Judge.

The Government has filed extensive points and authorities in support of its motion to bar the introduction of testimony by expert witnesses on the defendant’s mental state at the time of the bank robbery for which she is now on trial. While the Court has no quarrel with the basic tenet of the decisions cited, it does not find them applicable to the case at hand.

In large part, the Government’s argument is that since in this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. Charles Anthony HartfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Tommie Louis Brown, United States of America v. Virgil David Swain, United States of America v. Robert Lee NoblesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. Russell W. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Marx v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Ibn-Tamas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API