Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The detailed misbehavior report, authored by a correction officer who observed the incident and cosigned by another correction officer who also observed the incident, constitutes substantial evidence to support respondent’s determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [i]), prohibiting the possession of contraband that may be classified as a weapon (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; Matter of Perez v Wilmot, 67 NY2d 615, 616-617). Petitioner’s denial of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foster v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Perez v. WilmotNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Barner v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Carini v. MannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Hay v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Hooper v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API