Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The detailed misbehavior report authored by a correction officer who observed the incident and cosigned by another correction officer, together with the testimony of petitioner and three correction officers at the disciplinary hearing, constitutes substantial evidence to support respondent’s determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 113.12 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [iii]), prohibiting possession of a controlled substance (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966; Matter of Rouse v Coughlin,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foster v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Rouse v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Griffin v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API