Legal Opinion
Hawkins v. Coombe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: The determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 113.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [1] ), prohibiting the possession of contraband that may be classified as a weapon, is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Torres v Coughlin, 213 AD2d 861; Matter of Mabery v Coughlin, 168 AD2d 879, lv denied 77 NY2d 808; cf., Matter of Varela v Coughlin, 203 AD2d 630). The contraband was found under petitioner’s locker located in petitioner’s cell, an area over which petitioner had control. That evidence "is sufficient to give rise to a reasonable inference of petitioner’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Torres v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Varela v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Mabery v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Rouse v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hay v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Fereira v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Lee v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Mullady v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Polite v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.