Legal Opinion

Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor v. Bath Iron Works Corporation

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 13, 1995No. 94-1094PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

Bath Iron Works, Inc. (“Bath”) is a Maine corporation that has long engaged in shipbuilding and the repair of ships. It has employees who are covered by the Long-shore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-50 (the “Longshore Act”). That statute enacts an extensive workers’ compensation program that protects longshore and other specific classes of workers whose injuries occur upon navigable waters of the United States or adjoining facilities like piers and dry docks. Id. § 903(a).

For the most part, scheduled payments for death or disability are made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. BettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Puerto Rico Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission, and United States of America, Comtronics, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  5. Reich v. Bath Iron Works Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Neely v. Benefits Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Farrin v. Maine School Administrative District No. 59District Court, D. Maine · 2001
  3. Solis v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
  4. Neely v. BRBCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Neely v. Benefits Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API