Legal Opinion

Reich v. Bath Iron Works Corp.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided November 10, 1993No. Civ. No. 92-325-P-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. U)

GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.

This case is brought under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (hereinafter “LHWCA” or “Act”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-50. Plaintiff asserts in this action that Defendant Bath Iron Works Corporation (hereinafter “BIW”), which acts as a self-insurer in regard to compensation under the LHWCA, has in its annual required reports understated its workers’ compensation payments made under the Act insofar as it has failed to include in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation v. Garrity Oil Company, Inc., Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation v. Garrity Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
Angel Ortega-Rosario v. Francisco Alvarado-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor v. Bath Iron Works CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995