Legal Opinion

People v. Vasquez

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 9, 2004No. 03SA218PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

I. Introduction

In this case, the defendant is on trial for first degree murder, and the state has indicated its intent to seek the death penalty. The defendant claims that he is mentally retarded. Section 18-1.3-1102, 6 C.R.S. (2003) (the “statute”), is the statute that sets forth the procedures to be followed when a defendant raises issues of mental retardation in a death penalty case. Upon motion of the defendant, the trial court here declared the statute unconstitutional because it requires the defendant to prove retardation by clear and convincing evidence to the satisfaction of the court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Cooper v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Warren Lee Hill, Jr. v. Carl HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  2. State v. GrellArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. E-470 Public Highway Authority v. RevenigSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Cacioppo v. Eagle County School District Re-50JSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. Owens v. Colorado Congress of Parents, Teachers & StudentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API