Legal Opinion

Lindeberg v. Murray

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1921No. 16124PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered April 30, 1920, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for equitable relief, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Appellant, James A. Murray, has appealed from a decree entered by the trial court rescinding a contract whereby the respondent, Lindeberg, agreed to purchase, and appellant, Murray, agreed to sell, 1,519 shares of the capital stock of the Bankers Trust Company of Tacoma for the sum of $14,000. It is conceded that the case turns almost entirely upon questions of fact, and while there is com*484paratively little dispute regarding the facts, the parties are widely apart in the construction and emphasis which they lay upon the facts, and in the conclusions which they draw therefrom.

The history of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stahl v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ross v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Simonson v. FendellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hinson v. JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Thiel v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Seattle-First National Bank v. EarlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API