Legal Opinion

Stalker v. Pierce

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 2011No. 61A04-1008-GU-562PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Protected Person/Cross-Ap-pellee, David L. Stalker (Stalker), appeals the trial court’s approval of Appellee-For-mer Guardian/Cross-Appellant’s, Mary C. Pierce (Pierce), final accounting and the trial court’s denial of Stalker’s request for money damages.

We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

ISSUES

Stalker presents two issues on appeal, which we restate as follows:(1) Whether Pierce breached her fiduciary duty as Stalker’s guardian; and(2) Whether Pierce violated Stalker’s due process rights when she failed to notify Stalker of her…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. McGill v. LingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Slauter v. FavoriteIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Euler v. EulerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Guardianship of StalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API