Legal Opinion
In re Checkosky
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 21, 1992No. Misc. Action No. 92-103PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
Petitioners move for an order to perpetuate certain testimony and to preserve documentary evidence on the authority of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 27. They cite publicly-reported allegations of impropriety in an ongoing Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) proceeding which involves the petitioners. Petitioners acknowledge that when the final SEC decision issues, it would be reviewable directly by the Court of Appeals, but claim that there is an immediate need for an order to preserve any evidence of impropriety for that potential appeal. The SEC…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lombard's, Inc. v. Prince Manufacturing, Inc. And Chesebrough-Pond's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Lewis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Richard A. Ash, on Behalf of Himself, and on Behalf of Bethelehem Steel Corporation v. Stewart S. Cort, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation, NominalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Mosseller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Checkosky v. SecCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company v. United States of America and the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Checkosky v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- State of Nevada v. Hazel R. O'leary, Secretary of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Gernstein v. LakeNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.