Legal Opinion

Sweat v. Hines

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1921No. 21677PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Dawes county: William: H. Westover, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Troup, District Judge.

This is an action for damages against Walker D. Hines, as director general of railroads, brought by Anna Mabel Sweat, the administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, who at the time of the accident, resulting in his death, was a freight conductor in the employ of the defendant. The action is brought under the federal employers’ liability act (U. S. Comp. St. 1918, secs. 8657-8665) and involves the alleged violation of the federal safety appliance act (U. S. Comp. St. 1918, secs. 8605-8650).

*3The plaintiff’s petition contains the nsnal allegations necessary to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Culver v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Kepler v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Wolfe v. MendelNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API