Legal Opinion

Luff v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1925No. 18700PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The only question now presented in this case involves the construction of the language of Section 13680, General Code, as amended in 110 Ohio Laws, 301, or rather the application of the provisions of that section to the facts presented in this case. Its language is clear and unambiguous. The provision that a defendant feeling himself aggrieved by a decision of the court may present his bill of exceptions thereto, which the court shall sign, and that such bill of exceptions shall be made a part of the record and have like force and effect as in civil cases, is followed by this language:

“The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Anderson v. SpenceOhio Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Luff v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Tenesy v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. State v. ParnellOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. State v. ThompsettOhio Court of Appeals · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API