Legal Opinion

State v. Parnell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By CARPENTER, J.

The defendant-appellant, Charles Stuart Parnell, was convicted and sentenced on an indictment charging obtaining money by false pretense. From such sentence he appealed to this court on questions of law. Two motions by the state claim the court’s consideration. They are, first, to sti’ike the bill of exceptions from the files for the reason it was not filed within the lime required by law, and, second, to dismiss the appeal because the appellant’s brief and assignments of error were not filed within the time fixed by statute.

The material dates of events in the progress…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Luff v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Luff v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Gusweiler v. Riverview Apartments, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. In Re Estate of ArrasmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Doe v. RoeOhio Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jarboe v. Workingmen's Overall Supply Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. State, Ex Rel. Merrill v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API