Legal Opinion

Tenesy v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1938No. 26687PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

It is apparent that the controlling question in this case is whether, when an appeal is taken on questions of law, Section 11564, General Code, as now in force, requires the filing of the bill of exceptions or objections in the trial court, within forty days after the overruling of the motion for a new trial, to enable the reviewing court to consider its contents.

Several of the Courts of Appeals have answered this question affirmatively, and we find ourselves in accord.

The pertinent part of Section 11564, General Code, now as before amendment, pertains exclusively to the trial court. Boone v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Luff v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Boone v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Matter of LandsOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In Re LockeOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Loos v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. O'Neil v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hart v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API