Legal Opinion
Harold v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 10, 1980No. 424-79PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCowen, Senior Judge
Plaintiff, the widow of David D. Harold, former Chief of the Aldan, Pennsylvania Police Department, sued here to recover a payment of $50,000, which she claims is due her by virtue of the Public Safety Officers’ Benefit Act of 1976, Pub. L. 94-430,90 Stat. 1346, codified as 42 U.S.C. § 3796, et seq. (1976).1 Both parties have moved for summary judgment and there are no material facts in dispute. For the reasons stated herein,, we hold that plaintiff is entitled to the claimed payment and accordingly grant her motion for summary judgment.
I
The Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act of 1976 is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen, Local 760Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Honeywell Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Demutiis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Smykowski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Maria Demutiis and Nicolas Demutiis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Tafoya v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.