Legal Opinion

Carson v. J. L. Mott Iron Works

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 12, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond in an action of assumpsit. ' Judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

J. L. Mott Iron Works, a corporation, instituted its action of assumpsit against J. Preston Carson and J. Graham Davidson, partners trading under the firm name of Graham Davidson and Company, as guarantors of debts aggregating $1,259.36 due to the plaintiff company for goods furnished the Southern Plumbing and Electric Company, also incorporated. Process was not served upon Mr. Davidson, but the action proceeded against Mr. Carson, who filed a plea of non assumpsit. Upon the trial of the cause all matters of law and fact being submitted to the court, there was a judgment for the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aragon Coffee Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  2. Martin's Administrator v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  3. Hoster-Columbus Associated Breweries Co. v. Stag Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  4. Copperthite v. Loudoun National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Talich v. MarvelNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Rogers v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  3. Pauley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  4. Harris v. WallCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
  5. Livermon v. LloydSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API