Legal Opinion

In re Declaratory Ruling re SDCL 62-1-1(6)

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2016No. 27463PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Attorney James Leach petitioned the Department of Labor for a declaratory ruling regarding the application of a statute. The statute governs the “earnings” used to calculate .the “average weekly wage” in workers’ compensation cases. Leach contended that discretionary bonuses .should ;be ..included in the ■ calculation. The Department , ruled that only nomdis-cretionary bonuses should be included, and Leach appealed to circuit court. The court, sua sponte, dismissed the appeal because it concluded that the Department lacked jurisdiction to issue such rulings. Leach now…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olson, Blake, Massie v. Butte County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Novotny v. Sacred Heart Health ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Rhines v. S.D. Dept. of CorrectionsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Jensen, Hoffman v. Dep't of CorrectionsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Petition for Declaratory RulingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API