Legal Opinion

Aetna U.S. Healthcare v. Higgs

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 16, 1997No. 96-2525-JWLPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff insurance company has filed the present interpleader action concerning $27,-000 in life insurance proceeds. The matter is presently before the court on plaintiffs motion to be dismissed and for other relief (Doc. 20). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part.

Federal rule 22 1 permits a stakeholder to bring an interpleader action when it may be exposed to multiple liability. Fed. R.Civ.P. 22. Plaintiff asserts that it may be exposed to multiple claims for the insurance proceeds because…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harper Ex Rel. Harper v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. General Atomic Co. v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  3. Glass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  4. Transamerica Premier Ins. Co. v. GrowneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Club Exchange Corporation v. SearingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lutheran Brotherhood v. ComyneDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002
  2. Allianz Life Ins. v. AgorioDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. Primerica Life Ins. Co. v. FrantzDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
  4. Farmers New World Life Insurance Company v. Advanced Surgical Care, LLC; Advanced Surgical Care GI Diagnostics, LLC; and Estate of Marinus Koning, by and through its Affiant Patricia O. O’NeillDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. PereaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API