Legal Opinion
J.C. & Associates v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 2, 2001No. 99-AA-203PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Petitioner J.C. & Associates applied for a permit to raze significant portions of a fire-damaged building that is also a designated historic landmark. After inspecting the structure, the Building and Land Regulation Administration (BLRA) denied the application on the ground that no emergency conditions existed that would necessitate immediate demolition of the structure and thus excuse petitioner’s failure to satisfy applicable requirements of the Historic Landmark and Historic District Preservation Act of 1978 (the Historic Preservation Act), D.C.Code §§ 5-1001 et…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murphy v. McCloudDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- District of Columbia v. Sierra ClubDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Simpson v. District of Columbia Office of Human RightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Chevy Chase Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia CouncilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tucci v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- D.C. Appleseed Center for Law & Justice, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities, & BankingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Mallof v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Powell v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- District of Columbia v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.