Legal Opinion

Estergren v. Sager

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1940No. Civ. 11903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Plaintiff and defendant were owners in common of a certain tractor. Plaintiff commenced this action to recover possession of the tractor and damages for loss of use. The complaint alleged that on February 23, 1935, the defendant ‘ ‘ wrongfully and without plaintiff’s consent seized said Allis-Chalmers Caterpillar Tractor and took the same into his own possession and converted the same to his own use, and has ever since said date refused to return said tractor to plaintiff or account to plaintiff for the use of said tractor or to compensate plaintiff for his interest therein”. It was further…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Luckey v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hayden v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  3. Hinkel v. CrowsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Keele v. ClouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Greenstone v. Claretian Theological SeminaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Glidden v. WillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API