Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided August 15, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Will Feland Prosecuting Attorney Seventeenth West Judicial District P.O. Box 423 Lonoke AR 72086

Dear Mr. Feland:

This is in response to your request for a follow-up opinion to Opinion No. 89-013. That opinion dealt with the issue of the residence of a constable-elect as it affected his eligibility to hold office and whether, if he was ineligible, the incumbent constable remained in office. You indicate now that the constable-elect did in fact remain in the township and residence is therefore not in issue. You inquire now as to whether the fact that the constable-elect was not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1870
  2. Smith v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. Hutcheson v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  4. Jewett v. McConnellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. BlundellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API