Legal Opinion
Bell v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 10, 2001No. 00-1039PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
Pacific Bell petitions for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which found that the company committed an unfair labor practice by refusing to bargain with the Telecommunications International Union, California Local 103 IFPTE, AFL-CIO (TIU). Pacific Bell contends that its refusal to bargain was justified by a good faith reasonable doubt regarding TIU’s authority to represent the bargaining unit’s members in negotiating a new collective bargaining agreement. Because we find substantial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allentown MacK Sales & Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Labor Relations Board v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Billie Davenport v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Donald Moreau v. James River-Otis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marion Hospital Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Marion Hospital Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003