Legal Opinion

State v. SWEAT

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 8, 1952No. 16616PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fishburne, Justice.

The defendants, Frank Sweat, Munroe Sweat, Clifford Sweat, Eugene Tindall, and Willie Yarboro were tried un der an indictment containing three counts, to wit: (1) Housebreaking, (2) Larceny, and (3) Receiving stolen goods. All of the defendants were convicted of housebreaking and larceny except the defendant, Clifford Sweat, and he was convicted of receiving stolen goods.

The first count charged all of the defendants with fe-loniously breaking and entering on September 6, 1950, the Independent Tobacco Warehouse of J. H. Dixon, Sr., J. H. Dixon, Jr., L. H., Bane, Sr., and L.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leon v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State v. SowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. State v. TindallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. BouknightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1899

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. MoultrieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. RutledgeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  4. Weinhauer v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API