Legal Opinion

State v. Tindall

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 8, 1948No. 16142PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fishburne, Justice.

The appellant, Sam Tindall, a white man, and one Preston Cade, a colored man, were tried together on an indictment containing two counts. In the first count the appellant was charged with the crime of receiving stolen goods on October 16, 1947, the property of Frank Ellerbe, knowing them to have been stolen. The second count charged appellant and Cade with grand larceny of the same goods. The subject matter of the alleged offenses consisted of four bags of sample or loose cotton, each bag containing approximately twenty-two pounds, with a total value of $22.40. A trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leon v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Maumee v. GeigerOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. MoultrieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. SWEATSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. Locke v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Osborne v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API