Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 27, 1979No. 21093PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

Appellant Isaac Brown, Jr., was found guilty of robbery and appeals. Error is assigned to the trial judge’s jury instructions in two particulars. We affirm.

Appellant’s first contention is that the charge on the offense of robbery improperly over-emphasized the element of lack of the victim’s consent to the taking. He argues that such emphasis effectively eliminated the jury’s need to find the element of felonious intent, and in the context of this case, amounted to an indirect and impermissible comment on the facts. We disagree.

The common-law offense of robbery is essentially…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. VaughnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. GatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. SWEATSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. Young v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. GilbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. WhippleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. State v. CondreyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. Al-AminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API