Burg v. Burg
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.
Appellant complains that the division of property takes substantially everything from him and gives it to the respondent; that, contrary to sec. 247.26, Stats., the trial court did not give due regard to his legal and equitable rights. While the division would appear to be one-sided in the wife’s favor, there are a number of factors in this case which, in our opinion, justify the trial court’s determination in that respect.
For a period of two years while the parties lived in Milwaukee the wife took in roomers and the room rent contributed to the improvement of their property and the family…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gauger v. GaugerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Hansen v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Hoffman v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lacey v. LaceyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Kronforst v. KronforstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Caldwell v. CaldwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Bussewitz v. BussewitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Kriesel v. KrieselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.