Legal Opinion

Kriesel v. Kriesel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1967PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Appellant relies upon the rule of Hansen v. Hansen (1951), 259 Wis. 485, 49 N. W. (2d) 434, in contending that the alimony order is void. In Hansen there was an appeal from a judgment awarding $1 a year alimony. No reason for granting of permanent alimony of $1 per year was given by the trial court. Accordingly, this court concluded that the award was arbitrary and the judgment was modified to strike that provision from the judgment. Nowhere in that opinion was it implied that the award was void as being beyond the trial court’s jurisdiction. Rather, it is clear that it acted within its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kronforst v. KronforstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Werner v. RiemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Zrimsek v. American Automobile Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hansen v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Burg v. BurgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Borello v. U.S. Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  2. John A. Pliska and Stanley T. Pliska v. City of Stevens Point, Wisconsin and James BenzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Hartt v. HarttSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  4. State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. Borozny v. PaineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API