Legal Opinion

In Re Richard M.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 15, 1999No. 1 CA-JV 98-0182PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBARINO, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Richard M. appeals from the juvenile court’s determination that he violated the terms and conditions of his probation. We agree and we reverse and remand.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In May 1997, Richard was found to be in violation of his probation. That same month, he was placed on juvenile intensive probation supervision (JIPS). In December 1997, the court continued Richard on JIPS after adjudicating him delinquent for aggravated criminal damage. Term nine of Richard’s December 1997 written terms of probation stated that he was to allow drug…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WatkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Matter of Maricopa Cty. Act. No. Jv-508488Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. In Re Marie G.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Thomas D.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. In Re Luis V.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API