Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1994No. CR-93-0354-PRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The trial court found that defendant violated identical terms of his three probations. On appeal, the court of appeals held that, notwithstanding the provisions of Rule 27.7(c)(2), Ariz.R.Crim.P., a probation violation could be based on a violation of an oral probation term if the defendant admitted he received notice of the oral term. State v. Robinson, 177 Ariz. 24, 864 P.2d 1056 (App. 1993). We granted review to determine the propriety of this interpretation of Rule 27-7(c)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. StottsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. WatkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. KorzuchArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Matter of Maricopa Cty. Act. No. Jv-508488Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. In Re Richard M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. In re the Appeal in Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. In re John C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API