Legal Opinion

In Re Marie G.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 26, 1997No. 1 CA-JV 96-0153PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

The juvenile (“Appellant”) appeals from a term of probation imposing ten weekends of detention and promising a no-hearing waiver of detention each week that she tested negative for drugs. Appellant argues that this term violates her constitutional rights. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm with the caveat that this no-hearing process is proper only if it results in a waiver of detention; it cannot result in the juvenile going into detention.

I

Appellant was adjudicated delinquent based on her admission to one count of false reporting. To those concerned with her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. In Re the Appeal in Pinal County, Juvenile Action No. J-169Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. Ronald Moss, Etc., and Sarah Sermons, Etc. v. Sidney Weaver, Donald Stone, Dixie Chastain, William Gladstone, Etc., and Richard E. Gerstein, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Bell v. Superior Court in & for Cty. of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re J.G.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. In Re Richard M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. In Re JGCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. In re J.A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API