Legal Opinion

Rogers Park Water Co. v. Fergus

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 25, 1901No. 56PublishedCited by 20 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. This is a petition for a writ of mandamus which was brought by the defendant in error on the 13th of December, 1897, in the circuit court of Cook County, State of Illinois, against the plaintiff in error, to compel it to furnish him water at rates fixed by an ordinance enacted by.the city of Chicago. • The defence is that such ordinance impairs the obligation of the contract which plaintiff iff error claims to 'have with…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. This is a petition for a writ of mandamus which was brought by the defendant in error on the 13th of December, 1897, in the circuit court of Cook County, State of Illinois, against the plaintiff in error, to compel it to furnish him water at rates fixed by an ordinance enacted by.the city of Chicago. • The defence is that such ordinance impairs the obligation of the contract which plaintiff iff error claims to 'have with the village of Rogers Park before its annexation to the city of Chicago, as hereinafter mentioned. The village of Rogers…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

At the time of the passage of the ordinance in November, 1888, by the village of Rogers Park, counsel for plaintiff in error says “ two general acts were in force in Illinois, which related to the power of municipalities to pass ordinances for waterworks to be built and operated by private enterprise.’-’ The first is as follows:

“ An act entitled £ An act to enable cities, incorporated towns and villages to contract for a supply of water for public use, and to levy and collect a tax to pay for the water so supplied.’. • Approved April 9,1872.” In force July 1,1872. Laws, 1871-2, p. 271. This…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Omaha Water Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. State ex rel. Triay v. BurrSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  4. City of Tampa v. Tampa Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1903
  5. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API