Legal Opinion

City of Tampa v. Tampa Waterworks Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1903PublishedCited by 39 opinions

This case was decided by the Court In Banc. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County.

1Opinion of the Court

STATEMENT.

From the pleadings it appears that on September 20, 1887, the City of Tampa entered into a contract with W. A. Jeter and A. E. Boardman and their -associates, constituting the Tampa Waterworks Company, for supplying the city and its inhabitants with water. By this contract the water company agreed to erect waterworks and to supply the city for. public purposes in the manner therein stated for a period of thirty years, and the city agreed to pay $4,950 per annum, in equal semi-annual payments, for certain hydrant rentals, and if payments were not promptly made vouchers bearing 7 per…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. SchottlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Freeport Water Co. v. Freeport CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Bienville Water Supply Co. v. MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Sioux City Street Railway Co. v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. American Federation of Labor v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Anchor Hocking Corp. v. Jacksonville Electric AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
  3. State ex rel. Triay v. BurrSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  4. State ex rel. Ellis v. Tampa Water Works Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. Southern Utilities Co. v. City of PalatkaSupreme Court of Florida · 1923

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API