Legal Opinion
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen
District Court, D. Utah
Decided February 8, 1999No. 95-NC-94 KPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
BOYCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
The defendant, Amway Corporation, has made a motion to disqualify Dr. Nicholas DiFonzo from acting as an expert witness or consultant for plaintiff Procter & Gamble. DiFonzo was contacted by Amway’s attorneys in May 1996 and arrangements were made for an interview and consultation with DiFonzo about matters that could be pertinent to litigation between Amway and Procter & Gamble. Dr. DiFonzo is an expert on rumors. A fee for the consultation was arranged and paid. Consultation between Dr. DiFonzo and Amway’s attorneys took place on June…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Durflinger v. ArtilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
- Koch Refining Co. v. Jennifer L. Boudreau M/VCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. EMC Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Grioli v. Delta International MacHinery Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- In Re Pelvic mesh/gynecare Lit.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Mays v. Reassure America Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.