Legal Opinion

Sigma-Aldrich Corporation v. Omar Vikin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 2014No. ED100575PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROY L. RICHTER, Judge.

Sigma-Aldrich Corp. (“Sigma”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in a court-tried case, denying its request for injunc-tive relief and ruling that a non-compete provision in an agreement (“Agreement”) between Sigma and the defendant-respondent, Omar Vikin (“Defendant”), was unenforceable with regard to Defendant’s new position at Alfa Aesar (“Alfa”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Johnson-Matthey Catalog Co. Inc. We affirm.

I. Background

Due to the sensitive nature of the subject matter involved, our recitation of the facts here is limited.

Sigma first hired…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. PettitKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Mills v. MurrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Healthcare Services of the Ozarks, Inc. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. Whelan Security Co. v. KennebrewSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. Continental Research Corp. v. ScholzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kathryn Jimenez, Petitioner/Respondent v. Cintas CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Beyond the Dog, LLC v. Allyson Salzer and Canine Behavioral Blueprints, LLC; Allyson Salzer and Canine Behavioral Blueprints, LLC v. Beyond the Dog, LLC, Kristyn Echterling-Savage, and Sean SavageDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
  3. Biovant, LLC v. WassenaarDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
  4. Biovant, LLC v. WassenaarDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
  5. Control Technology & Solutions, LLC v. Omni Energy Partners, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API