State v. Nason
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.
¶1 James Robert Nason challenges an order imposing sanctions for his failure to meet the requirements of his sentence. Specifically, Nason failed to pay his legal financial obligation (LFO), failed to provide a proper address, failed to report as directed, and failed to turn himself in to jail to serve a 60 day sentence. Nason’s challenge to the order centers primarily on a provision1 that has been colloquially referred to as an “auto-jail”2 provision. The provision reads:
*940The defendant shall pay $30 or more monthly, effective 8-1-07. The case is to be reviewed 10/31/07 for compliance. If the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. CatlingWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. MathersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Michael Christopher SheltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. NasonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.