State v. Catling

*254 ¶1 This case concerns application of the Social Security Act's antiattachment statute, 42 U.S.C. § 407 (a), in the context of mandatory legal financial obligations imposed on a convicted felon. Specifically, the issue is whether under the circumstances of this case, the trial court's imposition of mandatory legal financial obligations violates the antiattachment statute. The Court of Appeals held that the particular financial obligations imposed here did not violate the federal antiattachment statute but remanded for clarification of the payment order. For the *255 reasons discussed below, we…