Maimen v. Union Special Mach. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
The opinion of the learned judge below, reported in 161 Fed. 748, so fully and clearly resolves the points in controversy that it seems unnecessary to paraphrase at length the reasoning by which his conclusions were severally attained.' After careful consideration of all the points raised'on appeal in behalf of the appellant, our conclusion is that the issues were rightly decided in the court below. In this court, as in that, the appellant rested his claim to anticipation mainly upon the Muther patent. That the pat-*441cut in suit, however, shows inventive advance upon that,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Caramel Co. v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
- Union Special Mach. Co. v. MaiminDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Franklin Brass Foundry Co. v. Shapiro & Aronson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
- Toledo Metal Wheel Co. v. Foyer Bros. & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Allied Metal Stamping Co. v. Standard Electric Equipment Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1932
- Rohm & Haas Co. v. Permutit Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.