American Caramel Co. v. Mills
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
On Motion to Recall and Amend Mandate.
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, District Judge.
By the opinion heretofore filed the decree of the court below was reversed, with directions to reinstate the bill and grant the relief there prayed, for (149 Fed. 743, 79 C. C. A. 449); and, the mandate having gone out in that form, it was. of course binding. Our attention is now called to the fact that among the prayers of the bill was one that the infringing machines should *148Re delivered up to be destroyed, and an order to that effect was accordingly incorporated into the decree which was entered. This was an unusual prayer (American Bell Telephone Co. v. Kitsell [C.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States Mitis Co. v. Midvale Steel Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
- American Caramel Co. v. Thomas Mills & Bro.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
- American Bell Tel. Co. v. KitsellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
3Cited by13 opinions
- Flat Slab Patents Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Lion Mfg. Corporation v. Chicago Flexible Shaft Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Franklin Brass Foundry Co. v. Shapiro & Aronson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
- Van Meter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Maimen v. Union Special Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.