Legal Opinion
Valle Del Sol v. State of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 4, 2013No. 12-15688PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Two provisions in Arizona’s Senate Bill 1070 make it unlawful for a motor vehicle occupant to hire or attempt to hire a person for work at another location from a stopped car that impedes traffic, or for a person to be hired in such a manner. These provisions raise First Amendment concerns because they restrict and penalize the commercial speech of day laborers and those who would hire them. Arizona defends the provisions as traffic safety measures, designed to promote the safe and orderly flow of traffic. We acknowledge that Arizona has a real and substantial…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Centro De La Comunidad Hispana De Locust Valley v. Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- The Arc of California v. Toby DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- imdb.com Inc v. Xavier BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Centro de la Comunidad Hispana de Locust Valley v. Town of Oyster BayDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.