Millspaugh v. Schultz
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Theodore F. Millspaugh against Frederick E. Schultz and others for the breach of a bond given in an injunction suit. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
In November, 1908, the plaintiff purchased, upon contract, a city lot on La Salle street, Detroit. Defendants Schultz and Schultz were the owners of the adjoining lot on the west. The plaintiff began the erection of a house on his lot. He had built the basement, put a subflooring on the first floor, the studding was up and sheeted, the roof was on, a chimney built, and some work had been done on the interior of the house. In January, 1909, the defendants Schultz and Schultz obtained an injunction restraining further building operations. At this time a bond was required and given in the sum of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Daniels v. CleggMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Hurtford v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
- Wilcox v. Toledo & Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Carmer v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gulf, Mobile & Northern R. v. WeldyMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
- Taylor v. BeltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915