Legal Opinion

Gulf, Mobile & Northern R. v. Weldy

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1943No. 35369PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

Upon a former appeal of this case the judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $10,000, as damages for personal injuries, was reversed because of an erroneous instruction. Gulf, M. & N. R. Co. v. Weldy, 193 Miss. 59, 8 So. (2d) 249. On the next trial, he recovered a verdict and judgment for the sum of '$20,000, and the defendant again appeals.

The appellant assigns as the principal grounds of error on this appeal: (1) the refusal of the court to grant a peremptory instruction in its favor, for the reason (a) that the testimony of the plaintiff as to how he sustained his injuries is so…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chesebrough v. . ConoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Bishop v. Brittain Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. Loper v. Yazoo M.V.R. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Walters v. Stonewall Cotton MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Alden Mills v. PendergraftMississippi Supreme Court · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Merchants Company v. HutchinsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Strong v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Grace v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Cosar v. BemoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Cosar v. BemoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API