Legal Opinion

Heelan v. Security National Bank

Suffolk County District Court

Decided April 30, 1973PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowaed Bebleb, J.

This is an action to recover the penalty provided in subdivision 6 of section 108 of the Banking Law for the alleged ‘ ‘ knowingly taking, receiving, reserving or charging a greater rate of interest than that authorized by this section as computed by this section ”.

This litigation has developed into an acrimonious dispute generated, to a great extent, by the cavalier conduct of counsel for the defendant. His prosaic writing style, liberally sprinkled with invective and epithets directed at the plaintiff such as “deadbeat”, “ scoundrel ”, “knave”, and his use of ill-devised metaphor serves no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Halsey v. WinantNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Florida Land Holding Corp. v. BurkeNew York Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Florida Land Holding Corp. v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. H. D. S. Trading Co. v. RedischNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Begelfer v. NajarianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Freitas v. Geddes Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. McCorhill Publishing, Inc. Ex Rel. Barr v. Greater New York Savings Bank (In Re McCorhill Publishing, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  4. Kaiser v. MeinzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. American Express Co. v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API