Legal Opinion
H. D. S. Trading Co. v. Redisch
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHenry J. Latham, J.
Motion by plaintiff for summary judgment against the only three defendants who have answered in this action and who will hereinafter be called the defendants. In their opposing papers said defendants ask for summary judgment in their favor. By a separate notice of motion they also move for leave to amend their answer.
The action was brought to foreclose a second mortgage on certain real property located at Forest Hills, New York.
Plaintiff is a copartnership allegedly composed of two partners. On April 24, 1956, plaintiff entered into an agreement with Arkay Infants Wear, Inc. (hereinafter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Assets Realization Co. v. . RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Diehl v. . BeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Florida Land Holding Corp. v. BurkeNew York Supreme Court · 1929
- Florida Land Holding Corp. v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
3Cited by1 opinion
- Heelan v. Security National BankSuffolk County District Court · 1973