Mullen v. Noonan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district for Big Stone county, Brown, J., presiding, granting a new trial after verdict directed for-plaintiff in an action of replevin for a mare and colt of the value of $125.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
This is an action for the recovery of a horse and colt, the plaintiff declaring his ownership and right of possession. The defendants by their answer, and the intervenor by his complaint, denied the plaintiff’s title, and alleged that the intervenor, Andrew Noonan, owned the property, and he sought to recover the possession from the plaintiff, who had taken it from the defendants by the statutory proceedings in this action. The property formerly was owned by one Comer, from whom both parties claim title. The plaintiff, to-*542sustain his claim of title, testified that he purchased this with other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kenney v. GoergenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Bank of Farmington v. EllisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Tupper v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Johnson v. OswaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Furman v. TennySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gallick v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Jones v. McQueenUtah Supreme Court · 1896
- Cumbey v. LovettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Holt Motor Co. v. R. C. A. Photophone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Mutual Refining Co. v. Union Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927