Bank of Farmington v. Ellis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Dakota county, Crosby, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
Yanderburgh, J.*
The complaint is in the ordinary form in re-plevin for personal property. The answer of defendant Barclay de*271nies plaintiff’s title, and alleges title in Barclay under a chattel mortgage, executed by defendant Ellis. The reply admits the execution of this mortgage upon the property in question, but alleges that, it is fraudulent, and without consideration. Upon the trial it appeared that plaintiff also claimed under a mortgage of the same property, executed by Ellis, and dated August 18, 1881, and actually delivered at 12 o’clock m., of that day, and filed in the proper town…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harris v. FlyNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
- Smith & Hoe v. AckerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1840
- Gregory v. ThomasNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Flagg v. MannU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1837
- Shotwell v. HarrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- King Cattle Co. v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Tolbert v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Jordan v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Wright v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.