Legal Opinion

People v. Arant

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1988No. F008652PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*296Opinion

HAMLIN, Acting P. J.

Defendant was convicted on his plea of nolo contendere to violation of Penal Code section 4573.6, possession of drug paraphernalia by a state prison inmate. The underlying facts are not in dispute: defendant was searched when he was transferred into the California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi from Folsom State Prison, and incident to the search defendant was X-rayed. The X-ray revealed a foreign object secreted in defendant’s rectum which was found to consist of an altered hypodermic syringe in a plastic tubular container. Consistent with his plea bargain,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pollack v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. McCartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. California Teachers Assn. v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HoldsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. MirmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API