Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Leer, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 9, 1990No. 90-0019-FTPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, P.J.
Leer, Inc. (Leer) appeals from a judgment awarding Bernard Siegel and Liela Siegel, d/b/a Cap Connection (Cap), actual attorney's fees pursuant to sec. 135.06, Stats., of the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law (WFDL). Leer argues that the circuit court should not have awarded attorney's fees because Cap prematurely commenced this action for injunctive relief under the WFDL. Leer also contends that the issue of whether its business relationship with Cap was truly a dealership was never fully litigated before the circuit court. Finally, Leer challenges the necessity and reasonableness of the fees.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Standard Theatres, Inc. v. State, Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. Hoa Duc PhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Shands v. CastrovinciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Lindevig v. Dairy Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Girl Scouts of Manitou Council, Inc. v. Girl Scouts of United States of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Richland School District v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations, Equal Rights DivisionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
- Wadena Implement Co. v. Deere & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Pachowitz v. LeDouxCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- DeWitt, Porter, Huggett, Schumacher & Morgan, S.C. v. KovalicCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.