Legal Opinion

Lindevig v. Dairy Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 4, 1989No. 88-0181PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

Dairy Equipment Company (DEC) appeals from a judgment requiring it to pay damages to Harold Lindevig, d/b/a Lindevig Farm Supply and to David Lindevig. DEC and Harold had a grantor/dealer relationship governed by the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law (WFDL), ch. 135, Stats. David managed Harold's dealership. DEC sent plaintiffs a termination letter which violated sec. 135.04. Plaintiffs obtained a temporary injunction in this action seeking damages resulting from DEC's termination letter. Upon receipt of the injunction, DEC rescinded the termination.

The issues are: (1) whether plaintiffs may…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  2. Pleasure Time, Inc. v. KussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Maslow Cooperage Corp. v. Weeks Pickle Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wisconsin Ass'n of Food Dealers v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Burg v. Miniature Precision Components, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mrozek v. Intra Financial Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Central SEC. and Alarm Co., Inc. v. MehlerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Frieburg Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Van Dale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Jauquet Lumber Co. v. Kolbe & Kolbe Millwork Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. Skrupky v. ElbertCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API