Legal Opinion

City of Kenai v. Filler

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1977No. 2685PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

This dispute arises out of a contract for architectural services entered into between the appellant City of Kenai and appellee George Filler. Both parties agree that a contract was entered into relating to the development of a civic center. The City’s first major argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in finding that the parties amended the original contract to increase the proposed cost and scope of the Kenai Civic Center and thus increase the size of Filler’s architectural fee under the payment terms of the original contract. Its second contention is that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Common Wealth Insurance Systems, Inc. v. KerstenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Ralphs v. HenslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Municipality of Anchorage v. SchneiderAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Earthmovers of Fairbanks, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Property Owners Ass'n of the Highland Subdivision a Portion of USMS 769 v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. City of Topeka v. ImmingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API