Earthmovers of Fairbanks, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The memorandum decision and order of the superior court is set forth in the appendix. We disagree only with the superior court’s conclusion that Earthmovers waived its right to mobilization costs incurred between April 27th and May 1 because it failed to submit documentation to the contracting officer within thirty days as requested. It appears that Earthmovers did submit documentation to the state within thirty days of the request. Such documents were attached to its administrative appeal dated June 24, 1985. In our view, this is sufficient compliance with the thirty day submission…
3Cases cited30 opinions
- Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- The United States v. Amdahl CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Prestex Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Laidlaw Transit, Inc. v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Bozied v. City of BrookingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Property Owners Ass'n of the Highland Subdivision a Portion of USMS 769 v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Housing Authority of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.